Curly Hair Focus Backfires: Shark Tank India 3 Entrepreneurs Regret Choice of Taapsee Pannu as Brand Ambassador

Arata, a haircare brand with Taapsee Pannu, faced skepticism on Shark Tank India. Despite valuation debates, they secured funding from Vineeta and Namita, navigating challenges and learning crucial lessons.

By Sonali Pandey
New Update
Tank India 3

In the high-stakes world of Shark Tank India Season 3, the duo behind Arata, a haircare brand with Taapsee Pannu as its ambassador, faced a rollercoaster of reactions from the 'sharks.' Already valued at over Rs 70 crore, the entrepreneurs, both named Dhruv, were seeking Rs 1 crore for a 1.5% equity stake. However, the sharks had diverse perspectives on their pitch.

The Dhruvs' Assurance Amidst Doubts

Facing immediate skepticism from Vineeta Singh about their motives for appearing on the show, the Dhruvs clarified that publicity wasn't their sole intention. Seeking genuine investment, they stood firm on their request for funding. The intrigue heightened as the sharks delved into the company's claims, product ingredients, and the backstory behind Arata.

Challenges and Praises in the Hot Seat

Deepinder Goyal commended Arata's success on Blinkit but withdrew due to Zomato policy conflicts. Aman Gupta, expressing fear, admired the entrepreneurs but refrained from investing. He questioned their shift from curly hair products, Arata's initial USP, and the entrepreneurs admitted to allocating excessive resources to that segment. Vineeta disagreed, citing positive reviews on Arata's curly hair products and suggesting they deviated from their unique selling proposition (USP) with increased capital.

Valuation Wars and Brutal Realities

Anupam Mittal, skeptical about Arata's valuation, opted out bluntly, accusing the entrepreneurs of self-deception and predicting a bleak future. Despite the criticism, Vineeta and Namita Thapar joined forces, proposing a joint offer of Rs 1 crore for 2% equity, valuing Arata at Rs 50 crore. The entrepreneurs had a minor negotiation, ultimately securing the desired funding.

Arata's Evolution: Debunking Myths

In response to doubts about their brand's evolution, the entrepreneurs clarified that Arata wasn't conceived as a curl-specific brand. However, Anupam remained unconvinced, insisting the valuation was unjustified. The exchange revealed the challenges of balancing product diversification and staying true to the brand's essence.

The Crucial Learning Curve

Despite facing skepticism and valuation debates, Arata's journey unveiled essential lessons. The entrepreneurs admitted over-indexing on resources for curly hair products, hindering their overall growth. Vineeta's disagreement emphasized the diverse perspectives within the industry, while Aman's fear highlighted the cautious approach investors sometimes adopt.

Arata's Triumph: Sealing the Deal

Ultimately, amidst the storm of doubts and critiques, the Dhruvs found a lifeline in Vineeta and Namita's offer. With a slight adjustment in the terms, they secured the funding they sought, marking a triumph in the competitive world of Shark Tank India.

In Retrospect: Arata's Path Forward

The episode not only showcased the challenges of entrepreneurship but also prompted Arata to reflect on their journey. Balancing investor expectations, staying true to the brand's roots, and learning from missteps emerged as crucial elements for Arata's continued success in the competitive beauty industry.